Saskia Giebl on the Bjork Lab and Googling for Learning – Education Rickshaw

Banner of Progressively Incorrect Podcast Saying New Episode Featuring Saskia Giebl

Welcome again to Progressively Incorrect, a podcast about artificial intelligence, emotional intelligence, and just plain standard intelligence. I am your host, Dr. Zach Groshell, and in this week’s episode I have the pleasure of interviewing Saskia Giebl about the advantages and perils of using Google for finding out.

I’m typically told that education and learning nowadays desires to adjust to satisfy the requirements of tomorrow. A single of the good reasons supplied is that pupils do not need to have to go to a trainer or a library anytime they would like to find out one thing They can merely Google anything on their smartphones. But before we get started replacing human lecturers with Google or AI application like ChatGPT, let us take into account some specifics. The to start with problem with a “Google-based” instruction is properly-recognized: Substantially of what is discovered on the net is unhelpful, hazardous, or factually incorrect. In order to type through all of the nonsense that is on the internet, college students want to know how to check with Google the correct thoughts. And therein lies the following challenge: In purchase to inquire the correct thoughts, students want to have a good deal of information by now. We can’t hope a student to spontaneously Google “What resources had been made use of to make sarcophagi” if they do not have the faintest clue what a sarcophagus is or why they even ought to care!

An additional problem with changing “old-fashioned teaching” with Google is something I figured out really a short while ago from looking at a collection of posts by this week’s guest. In Saskia Giebl’s study at the Bjork Understanding and Forgetting Lab at UCLA, she requested college students to either a) Google concerns to obtain solutions or b) Consider about the solutions to questions and then use Google to test their answers. As you possibly predicted, the pupils who thought about the inquiries to start with acquired more from applying Google than the pupils who Googled devoid of imagining. Even though Google is a useful software for obtaining details, it is also the scenario that relying on Google can make passive learning encounters that do not have interaction the head. 

I feel you’re definitely heading to get a kick out of this episode, which is stuffed with all types of spots to take a look at, like the variance concerning understanding and performance and a bit of a deep dive into the pre-testing impact. So, without even more ado, I give you episode 17 of time 2 of the Progressively Incorrect podcast, featuring Saskia Giebl.

UCLA Bjork Discovering and Forgetting Lab